“The end up in a world crisis; things

“The only force that can beat climate
change is the U.S army the government.

   The action that is being prosecuted is the
elimination of climate change from the list of threats to the security of the
United States under Trumps new National Security Strategy (NSS). In two of the
last four U.S administrations this action has not been touched because society
thinks that it’s not a very important problem, but the reality is that this
issue can cause a lot of irreparable damage if the necessary measures are not
taken to prevent this future catastrophe. The most urgent and important task is
facing climate change activists in the U.S to persuade the national security
establishment of the mistakenness of this decision if there are no plans of
taking this in consideration at the moment it should be considered in the next
NNS administration and the U.S security thinking in general (foreignpolicy.com).

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

     Of the four major goals of the State
Department protecting America is supposed to be the governments guiding goal
for the country. In this case the government and/or governor does not consider
the fact that this is a strong issue just like North Korea’s threatening with
nuclear world war. The government and/or governor does not necessarily care for
this issue because they tend to work on other issues they consider inevitable.
This issue of climate change is equally important like the rest of the world’s
issues; If we don’t strike down this issue we will end up in a world crisis;
things like plantation drying up, animals dying and explosions of methane gas
would be released due to the high temperatures of climate change and end life
on earth and leave only bacteria living which can cause the end of life its
self; if there are conflicts between countries military forces would be
expulsing all kinds of chemicals often causing the massive pollution in the
air. Only security establishments and national militaries make the link between the threat
of climate change and patriotic duty and convince ordinary voters that the
sacrifices required are necessary for the future safety of their countries.

    An event that took place on the year 2013 was president Obama’s
Climate action plan. This plan was meant to cut carbon pollution to make the
world clean for the sake of the future generation of Americans. Another past
action that was supposed to make a solution for climate change was the Paris
agreement; one in which more than 190 countries came together on establishing a
reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, keeping the temperature below 2 degrees,
help the global economy, create new jobs, lift out millions out of poverty,
among many other actions. One of the most important actions that the United
States put in effect was to talk about the agreement that was going to be
executed to avoid global warming and unite other countries with this idea to
carry it out; If the governor/government would follow the same steps our past
governor Barak Obama applied there wouldn’t be so many conflicts with other
countries and there would be more action towards problems like global warming
and peace between countries. It’s sad to think that in order to convince the
government and/or the society we have to convince the military forces around
the world so they can change the way people think about climate change to take
a full-blown action towards this global issue.

One of the IGO’s that can provide help would be the International
Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) this particular organization can help us with the
issue that we are facing because it cares for all living things from the
smallest young seed on the earth to the oldest person alive. This organization was meant to provide a
practical nuclear security in a peaceful and safe manner; the IAEA would
help give support on why this issue is a massive conflict by stating facts of
what could possibly happen in the near future and convince the government and
the NSS on keeping this issue on the list. The IAEA can help plan out simple
ideas that can make a huge difference to eliminate the climate change issue;
reducing the amount of CO2 humans waste every day, stop cutting down trees,
unplugging electronic devices that aren’t on use and make scientist experiment
on earth to find solutions on ways we can make our earth a safe & healthy
place to live. One of the NGO’s that can provide help would be the Greenpeace;
IAEA & Greenpeace work to help keep our planet a safe. Greenpeace is a non-governmental organization that defends,
exposes and confronts environmental problems. If both organizations would
unite it would be a better way of letting the department of state know that
this is something that shouldn’t be avoided and that neither the president or
the U.S military force should ignore; this situation should be pursued like any
other governmental problem because this effects all human beings; the world can
come to a devastating crisis in which the life cycle would be devastated.

   I would evaluate
the foreign policy action as one with which we should work together regardless
of the problems or differences we have because we all belong to in this life
cycle. I don’t agree with the government or governor to eliminate this serious
situation from the list because this is a disastrous conflict as well as many
conflicts that are seen today in many other countries. I would recommend that
all countries make agreements and not enter into war or conflicts that harm the
mental state of the people; if the world would speak, I would say how much pain
it feels to see everything that has happened in this time of crisis between
countries. This is the time where we are supposed to be solving problems instead
of provoking them.


I'm Simon!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out