Jebaraj(2004) has led an examination under entitle ” Information seeking patternin sec library an analysis.” the principle goal of the investigation was: todistinguish the category of clients. To know the recurrence of client’s visit.To know the department wise user strength.
To recognize the peak hours. torecognize the potentiality of the client. To know the maximum used section bysec clients. Majority of the users are male students, since the male studentsstrength in high. More number of client wants reading reference material . Thegreatest number of students come for circulation of books.
The frequency of usethe SEC library is once in a two days. The peak hour of utility is 1-2 PM. i.
e.Meal break.Manjunathaand Asundi (2004) watched that sericulture researchers needs wide variety ofinformation source for conduct, plan and develop experiment. Kinds ofinformation required by the sericulture researchers with in formal informationchannel to gather. This investigation recommender frame workers planning aninformation system that can give quality information timely and according tospecial need of the Journalist. It also prescribed an integrated system thatmust be capable to facilitate interpersonal feedback criticism between associates inside theassociation.Orme(2004) uncovered that Texas information Literacy Tutorials as an exampleof electronic instruction can be atleast as successful as face-to – face instruction for teaching first year understudiesbasic information research skill.Sharmaand pant (2004) uncovered the information seeking pattern of sientists ofdefense research and development establishment of Gwalior.
The outcomedemonstrated that 10% researchers of this foundation utilizing library forreferring the journal articles, 40.9% of researcher get library instruction and45.45% felt requirement for library instruction. Lack of reading material andlack of knowledge first great troublesto utilize library services and access data. One of the significant change ofcommunication media, web was most prevalent among the researcher. Singhand lahari (2004) has led an investigation under untitled “information seekingbehavior of health care paraprofessionals” The primary goal of the examinationwas: discover the Information needs of the paraprofessionals.
Learn theirInformation seeking Behavior. Investigation the source and different channelsuse by them. Design an effective model of HIS.Patitungkhoand Deshpande (2005) reports the consequence of an investigation of theInformation seeking behavior of faculty member of Rajabhat University inBangkok, Thailand. Data was collected byusing questionnaire from seven faculties in Rajabhat University. Resultdemonstrates that a large portion of respondents (41%) stands their strategyfor seeking information by counseling an educated person in the field. 230 seekinformation for getting ready Lectures.
54% of faculty access more referencedocuments from a book. It is uncovered that the vast majority of the facultymember(57%) utilized course books. 74% of respondents read informationmaterials in Thai and 24% read materials in English. They trace materials fromthe library by means of the web. Google.
com was use for seeking information by respondents. They use e-mail forcommunication. It is discovered that 42% of respondents were the Eric database.The larger part of respondents faced the regular issue while seekinginformation.Purnimaand Vikas (2005) dissected the information need of the college faculty ofHigher education in Manipuri. The examination uncovered that aside fromuniversities, most of the facultydidn’t aware about the information technology, because of lack ofinfrastructure in their libraries.
Anwar(2007) checked on various research studies on information needs and information seeking behavior of changed groupof people in Pakistan. He specified fifteen unpublished examinations directedregarding the subject so far.